Tim, developing doesn’t always get us further. Your previous scheme had a very clear attitude towards the given geometries, a few tweaks near the AT and the cute corner could have resolved any last ambiguities, and added some elegance. Instead of three simple moves there are now at least six very complex geometries. At the same time the transitions seem now forced; the LT is more another AT, and the GT is a space between 1 and 2, not part of either one. I’m strongly recommending trying one more time to make a few adjustments to your previous plan, format and narrate.
I am a student at the Boston Architectural College enrolled in the Distance Masters of Architecture Program. I live and work in Westerville, Ohio. I am happily married to my wife Cindy and have two children, Nathan and Jessica. I work within a family architectural practice, Shremshock Architects, Inc.
2 comments:
Tim, developing doesn’t always get us further. Your previous scheme had a very clear attitude towards the given geometries, a few tweaks near the AT and the cute corner could have resolved any last ambiguities, and added some elegance. Instead of three simple moves there are now at least six very complex geometries. At the same time the transitions seem now forced; the LT is more another AT, and the GT is a space between 1 and 2, not part of either one. I’m strongly recommending trying one more time to make a few adjustments to your previous plan, format and narrate.
OK, I am back to the first scheme.
Post a Comment